DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204
JBH
Docket No. NR6291-13,
1i March 2014 |
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
10 March 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
‘applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser
N42/088 dated aD. a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
..furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D-—-ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure: NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/088 dated (iE
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8210 13
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/103 dated ————e a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3859 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March-2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/067 dated (RP @ copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable Material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR552 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 duly 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1344 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1343-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2013. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR828 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support chereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUPSYSCOM letter 4050 Ser N42/067 dated 8 April 2014, a Copy of which is attached. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9340 13
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. nEter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3204 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3204-14 n official naval Consequently, when applying for a correction of a istence of record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ex probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2101 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NSSC letter 4050 Ser 142/079 dated 6 May 2014, 4 copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 1s on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6739 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR6739-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.